StoryTeller’s Determination Regarding a Request to Post an Insight

Use this form to respond to a Visitor’s formal request to post an insight. Formal requests have a unique Request ID#; it must be provided here. Visitor inquiries are otherwise communicated via StoryTeller’s Correspondence.

Story title(Required)

StoryTeller's Name (as published in the Story)(Required)

First Middle Last

Your identification passcode(Required)

DO NOT SHARE THIS CODE WITH ANYONE ELSE. Text typed in this field will be hidden.

Identification passcodes are two sets of four alphanumeric characters separated by "+". Peek·into·the·Past mailed you yours when you first published a story (or restored one from “inactive” status).

Your passcode authenticates you as the Story's active StoryTeller and confirms your permission to make occasional story and profile modifications.

Preliminary passcode verification(Required)

"Checking passcode" will appear if details in the fields "StoryTeller's Name" and "Your identification passcode" match your Profile Record.

Verifying your identification passcode(Required)

Double check your passcode by re-entering it above. If you require a replacement passcode, first save your work (see bottom of page); a link which brings you back to this page will be provided. Follow that link; then tap here.

Hidden

StoryTeller's Email Address(Required)

Name of the Visitor making the request(Required)

First Last

Request ID #(Required)

The Request ID # appears within the transmittal to the StoryTeller and a copy to the one making the request. Please refer to its subject line. Omit the lead "R."

Verifying Request ID #(Required)

"VERIFIED" will appear if details in the fields "Story Title," "Name of Visitor making the request," and "Request ID #" match our Record.

Hidden

Visitor's Email Address(Required)

StoryTeller's Decision of the Request(Required)

Although it does not substantiate the story, the insight itself and the underlying relationship of its author to the subject and story do not contradict aspects and do conform. I consent to its posting.

The insight itself and the underlying relationship of its author to the subject substantiates the story. I consent to its posting.

The insight itself and the underlying relationship of its author to the subject and story do not conform to the story. However, I consent to it being posted as "Non-conforming".

I do not consent to the request.

A re-determination found that the insight is now Non-conforming; and, subject to review by Peek·into·the·Past, will be removed.

Non-conforming aspects of the Visitor Insight(Required)

StoryTeller's comment to be posted along with the Visitor's.

StoryTeller's comment to be posted along with the Visitor's. If none, so state.(Required)

If there is a comment you chose to appear following the author's insight, state it here.

Explanation(Required)

Please elaborate on your decision. Are there aspects that, if cured by the author, would affect a reconsideration of your decision? If so, the author is encouraged to consider making a renewed request. Suppose the author appears within the story or claims a relationship with the subject. In that case, the insight may be posted yet identified as "non-conforming" along with the StoryTeller's point of view.

The story has developed to where the post is no longer conforming.(Required)

Please elaborate on your decision. Are there aspects that, if cured by the author, would affect a reconsideration of your decision? If so, the author is encouraged to consider making a renewed request. Upon request to Peek·into·the·Past, if the author appears within the story or claims a relationship with the subject, the post may remain identified as "non-conforming" along with the StoryTeller's point of view.

This is a preview of your submission. It has not been submitted yet.

Please take a moment to verify your information. You can go back to make changes. After you submit it, a copy of the details will be available for your records.

{all_fields:exclude[22,23,11,14,26,27]}

Phone

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.